<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reciprocity | CRiSS-LAB</title><link>https://criss-lab.com/tag/reciprocity/</link><atom:link href="https://criss-lab.com/tag/reciprocity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Reciprocity</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Autism, reciprocity, and classroom integration</title><link>https://criss-lab.com/blog/autism-classroom-reciprocity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://criss-lab.com/blog/autism-classroom-reciprocity/</guid><description>&lt;p>Classrooms are social systems. Learning, well-being, and inclusion depend not only on individual traits but also on the structure of relationships among students.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The Scientific Reports paper on autism, social integration, and reciprocity uses classroom interaction data to study how autistic students are embedded in peer networks. This kind of evidence can make inclusion more concrete: instead of relying only on aggregate perceptions, schools can observe patterns of cooperation, reciprocity, isolation, and integration.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>For CRiSS-LAB, the broader point is that education research needs relational measures. If inclusion is relational, then the data used to support inclusion should also be relational.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>