<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Misinformation | CRiSS-LAB</title><link>https://criss-lab.com/tag/misinformation/</link><atom:link href="https://criss-lab.com/tag/misinformation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Misinformation</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why retracted research keeps circulating</title><link>https://criss-lab.com/blog/collective-memory-retracted-science/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://criss-lab.com/blog/collective-memory-retracted-science/</guid><description>&lt;p>Science has formal mechanisms for correction, but correction is not the same as forgetting. Retractions can invalidate a result, yet the paper, its claims, and its downstream influence may continue circulating through citations, reviews, datasets, and public debate.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This is the motivation behind the FONDECYT Regular project &lt;strong>Collective Memory Decay in Science: Patterns and Determinants of Forgetting Retracted Research&lt;/strong>. The project studies how scientific communities remember and forget invalidated research by combining bibliometrics, network science, natural language processing, and models of collective memory.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The core question is practical: when correction does not change the memory of the system, misinformation can accumulate inside the scientific record. Understanding that process is a necessary step toward better science communication, editorial policy, and evidence governance.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>