Grouping strategies change classroom collaboration

Classroom grouping is not a neutral logistical decision. Whether students self-select, work with friends, or are assigned to more exploratory groups changes the social network that learning depends on.

Recent work with Javier Pulgar and collaborators studies this problem in high school physics. The results point to a useful tension: familiar groups can increase stability, but excessive stability can reduce new collaboration and limit exposure to different sources of information. More exploratory grouping can create broader contact, but it needs pedagogical support so that the network actually helps learning.

For CRiSS-LAB, this connects network science with a practical teaching question: how should classrooms be organized so that students feel enough trust to work together and enough novelty to learn from different peers?

Cristian Candia
Cristian Candia
Associate Professor and Head of CRiSS-LAB, School of Engineering and School of Government, Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile.

My research interests include collective behavior, collective and artificial intelligence, network science, and business analytics.